here is part three. though it has been divided into two parts but here is the full version of all of it. it begins by commenting on the political 'ya pound salaam alayka' mulla brigade and proves tha alahazrat considered them as fasiq . they also select alahazrat for what they want. secondly, it deals with the book matla al-qamrayn by alahazrat and points out some disrepancies in evidence provided for ijma. for example, it claims that there is ijma of afzaliyat for shaykhain i.e. hz abu bakr and hz umar yet the evidence provided for this ijma is about three i.e. abu bakr, umar and usman (ridwan Allah alayhim). claim is for two but evidence is for three. how is that acceptable? he himself say that there was a difference between Ali and Usman. claimd for two but evidence for three!!! strange!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_mJvK...